EDITORIAL: The MAGA manosphere and "toxic masculinity"

Right-wing male influencers don't live up to the vision of masculinity they promote and the left has a better alternative

The concept of toxic masculinity has become a contentious topic in cultural and political circles. A significant aspect of this discourse revolves around the influencers and figures in the so-called "manosphere," including Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, and Jordan Peterson. These personalities have garnered substantial followings and have shaped the understanding of masculinity for many young men today. Given this, it is vital to examine whether masculinity itself is broken and whether the rise of MAGA Trumpism is reflective of this phenomenon.

Central to the idea of toxic masculinity is the notion that certain male archetypes are harmful, both to individuals and society. Many of these influencers promote a narrow view of masculinity characterized by dominance, aggression, and physical strength, often perpetuating outdated stereotypes. They attract followers by presenting themselves as mentors, illustrating what it means to be a "real man" through the lens of alpha versus beta male dynamics. These figures typically exude a hyper-masculine persona, appealing to a demographic that feels lost or insecure in a changing world.

An interesting observation is that figures like Donald Trump do not fit the typical stereotypes often associated with alpha males. Trump, while projecting a strong masculine persona, notably lacks traditional physicality, choosing not to exercise regularly and relying on hair and skin treatments to maintain a youthful appearance. This disconnect between his self-styled image and reality illustrates how he leverages traits like stubbornness and an aversion to vulnerability to project strength.

Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate both exhibit qualities that complicate traditional notions of masculinity. Peterson's emotional vulnerability, often seen in his public displays of crying, challenges the stoic image typically associated with masculinity. Meanwhile, Tate’s braggadocio, emphasizing wealth and physical prowess, belies an underlying insecurity about his self-worth, often revealed through his need for constant validation on social media. Together, these traits highlight how both figures diverge from conventional masculine archetypes by revealing emotional depth and vulnerability.

The allure of these influencers can be partly attributed to the realities facing young men today. In many spheres, young men find themselves at a disadvantage compared to young women. While men still dominate leadership roles in business and politics, women have been outperforming men in educational settings. More girls are excelling in school, pursuing higher education, and entering elite professions. This shift can create feelings of inadequacy among young men, who may feel increasingly marginalized in romantic relationships. The perception that women are raising the bar for potential partners can leave some men feeling desperate for guidance and validation.

This sense of disconnection paves the way for the rise of what could be termed "distorted masculinity." Figures like Trump and Tate capitalize on young men's insecurities, offering a narrative that blames societal changes on "woke" ideologies. They promote an exaggerated version of masculinity that promises reclamation of status through dominance and aggression. The undercurrent of their messaging suggests that a return to traditional values—where male dominance overshadows female success—will restore balance and power.

The cultural phenomenon surrounding the glorification of hyper-masculinity is troubling. Many influencers promote an Instagram-worthy version of manhood that revolves around displays of strength, aggression, and stereotypical masculine symbols such as firearms and muscular physiques. This portrayal is deeply intertwined with a political ideology that venerates a bygone era of traditional masculinity, reinforcing harmful stereotypes and leading to further alienation of men who may not fit this mold.

While the right has effectively cultivated a narrative that glorifies a narrow interpretation of masculinity, the left has often struggled to present a meaningful counter-narrative. The lack of a healthy masculine archetype on the left leaves a vacuum that figures like Trump, Peterson, and Tate can fill with their regressive ideas. In this void, the left has yet to develop and promote alternative models of masculinity that emphasize strength coupled with compassion, leadership, and community building.

To counter the current narrative, the left must articulate a more holistic view of masculinity. This involves recognizing that qualities such as empathy, emotional intelligence, and collaboration are not signs of weakness but rather indicators of a well-rounded individual. Progressive masculinity should embrace strength and ambition but channel these traits toward constructive, community-oriented goals. The message should be clear: supporting others, including marginalized groups, does not diminish one's masculinity; instead, it enhances it by fostering understanding and connection.

Many figures in the realm of progressive masculinity can serve as role models. Individuals like Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, exemplify a new form of masculinity that marries traditional skills with progressive values. He demonstrates that one can appreciate and excel in typically masculine domains while also respecting and elevating women's roles in leadership. Similarly, Scott Galloway, a successful entrepreneur and professor, showcases how a wealthy, accomplished man can advocate for social issues without sacrificing his masculinity. Barack Obama stands as another example of a modern masculine figure who commands respect and authority not through aggression but through intelligence, empathy, and a collaborative spirit.

The left’s challenge is to promote these alternative models of masculinity while countering the distorted narratives from the right. This means highlighting the positive aspects of being a man without resorting to toxic behaviors or ideals. It requires a shift in cultural narratives surrounding masculinity, moving away from the glorification of aggression and dominance to one that values community, support, and emotional resilience.

The notion of a "crisis of masculinity," as posited by some on the right, often stems from a misguided belief that contemporary men are failing because they are not adhering to traditional masculine ideals. However, the real crisis may lie in the perpetuation of a narrow and damaging definition of what it means to be a man. The rise of influencers who embody these harmful ideals indicates a need for change—change that can only come from developing a healthier, more inclusive understanding of masculinity.

Ultimately, to foster a society where men can thrive without resorting to toxic behaviors, it is crucial to create spaces that encourage healthy expressions of masculinity. This means embracing diversity in masculine identities and promoting a model that champions strength as a force for good rather than a tool for dominance. The fight against toxic masculinity must be rooted in compassion and understanding, creating a more inclusive narrative that allows all individuals, regardless of gender, to find their place in a shared society.