If you've spent any time in the fitness corners of the internet—YouTube channels about "discipline," Instagram pages celebrating "alpha mindset," or podcasts preaching personal responsibility through physical transformation—you've likely encountered something troubling lurking beneath the surface. What started as innocent workout tips and motivational content has evolved into something far more sinister: a carefully constructed pipeline from gym culture to authoritarian ideology.
The transformation didn't happen overnight. For decades, fitness culture occupied a relatively apolitical space. Gym culture was about personal betterment, discipline, and health. But somewhere along the way, the pursuit of physical strength became entangled with a very specific vision of power, dominance, and social hierarchy.
The Alpha Industrial Complex
The shift began with the rise of what we might call the "alpha industrial complex"—a network of fitness influencers, self-help gurus, and lifestyle coaches who weaponized body image insecurities to sell not just protein powder, but entire worldviews. Figures like Jordan Peterson didn't just tell young men to "clean your room"—they positioned physical discipline as the foundation of moral authority. Joe Rogan's platform became a nexus where MMA commentary seamlessly blended with discussions of "traditional masculinity" and skepticism toward "weak" liberal values.
This wasn't accidental. The language of fitness culture—discipline, strength, dominance, hierarchy—maps perfectly onto authoritarian thinking. The gym became a laboratory for testing ideas about natural hierarchies, where the strong deservedly rule over the weak. Physical transformation became a metaphor for social transformation, with "alpha males" positioned as natural leaders who shouldn't be constrained by "feminine" concerns like empathy, cooperation, or institutional norms.
Consider the ecosystem that emerged: fitness YouTubers like David Goggins preaching extreme discipline and mental toughness, seamlessly connecting to figures like Andrew Tate who explicitly link physical dominance to male supremacy. The algorithm doesn't distinguish between wanting better abs and wanting to restore "traditional" gender roles—it just feeds you more content about becoming "stronger" than the competition.
The Body as Political Battleground
What makes this pipeline so effective is how it exploits legitimate male anxieties, anxieties I’ve previously acknowledged aren’t being addressed well by the political left. Young men facing economic uncertainty, social isolation, and changing gender dynamics found in fitness culture a promise of control and purpose. The gym offered clear metrics of success in a world where traditional markers of masculinity—economic stability, clear social roles, respect—felt increasingly elusive.
But the fitness-to-authoritarianism pipeline doesn't just prey on insecurity; it actively cultivates it. The constant emphasis on optimization, on becoming "elite," creates a perpetual state of dissatisfaction. You're never strong enough, disciplined enough, dominant enough. This manufactured inadequacy becomes fertile ground for resentment toward women, minorities, and anyone who seems to succeed through means other than raw physical or mental domination.
From Self-Help to Sedition
The January 6th insurrection crystallized how this pipeline operates in practice. The event revealed how the language and aesthetics of strength culture had been woven into extremist movements, with participants invoking warrior imagery, celebrating physical confrontation as patriotic duty, and treating political violence as a natural expression of masculine strength. The insurrection wasn't just political theater; it was the logical endpoint of years of content that glorified force as the ultimate arbiter of disputes.
This isn't to say that everyone who does CrossFit or follows David Goggins becomes a fascist. In fact, far from it. But the overlap isn't coincidental either. When physical strength becomes the primary measure of worth, when discipline becomes synonymous with dominance, when self-improvement becomes about rising above others rather than with others, the ideological groundwork for authoritarianism is already laid.
The Democratic Response: Missing the Point
When Democrats post gym selfies, they think they're fighting fire with fire and reclaiming masculinity from the right. But this response fundamentally misunderstands the problem. The issue isn't that conservatives look stronger; it's that our culture has accepted a particular type of strength as the primary currency of political legitimacy.
By playing the masculinity game on conservative terms, Democrats risk legitimizing the very frameworks they should be challenging. When progressive politicians feel compelled to prove their physical toughness, they're conceding that politics should be about dominance rather than cooperation, that leadership flows from individual strength rather than collective wisdom.
The real danger of the fitness-to-authoritarianism pipeline isn't that it makes conservatives look tough, but that it makes everyone accept toughness as the standard by which leaders should be judged. It reduces complex social problems to simple questions of who deserves to dominate whom.
Breaking the Pipeline
Disrupting this pipeline requires more than progressive politicians posting workout videos. It requires challenging the fundamental premise that physical strength translates to moral authority, that personal discipline justifies social dominance, that politics should be about the strong ruling the weak.
This means promoting models of masculinity based on collaboration rather than competition, emphasizing collective strength rather than individual dominance, and recognizing that true leadership often comes from those willing to be vulnerable rather than those desperate to appear invulnerable. Lifting up people around you and improving your community should be the currency of masculinity.
The fitness culture didn't have to become a pathway to authoritarianism. Physical health, discipline, and even competition can exist without valorizing domination and hierarchy. But as long as we treat strength as inherently political and politics as inherently about strength, we'll continue to see gym bros marching from their local gym to the Capitol steps, and beyond.
The question isn't whether Democrats can out-flex Republicans. It's whether we can build a politics that doesn't depend on flexing at all.
Paid memberships make articles like this possible. Your support helps cover the time, research, and work that go into each piece. If you find value in what you’re reading, consider becoming a paid Substack subscriber—it keeps this work going.
Why abandon physical fitness and leave that to the right? We can have healthy, strong bodies and strengthen our minds while keeping them open. We can possess the good things that the right has claimed as theirs and more. Don't let the image they show, prevent you from doing anything good for yourself. Just be the best that you can in everything that you do. You'll always be better than the hateful on the right.
I'm more worried about strength of character in a politician than how much they can bench press. But then I'm not a man.