Joe Rogan turns on Trump’s ICE crackdown

When a top podcaster in America starts describing ICE as “villains,” it’s a sign the spectacle is cracking, even inside Trump’s own media ecosystem.

Before we get into it: if you’re receiving this via email, thank you. You’re already subscribed. If you’re not, now is the time.

Joe Rogan appears to be doing something that, until recently, would have sounded unlikely: he’s publicly stumbling into the realization that the Trump-era ICE operation is not just controversial, it’s ugly, chaotic, and increasingly indefensible.

And the reason this matters is not because Rogan is suddenly delivering some brilliant, original political theory.

It matters because he has a massive audience, and because this represents a real shift from the posture we saw when he endorsed Donald Trump. Whether you like Rogan or can’t stand him, when someone with his reach starts describing ICE as “villains,” that’s not nothing. It’s a signal about where public sentiment is heading, even among people who helped normalize this entire mess.

“It’s ugly to watch”

What you’re seeing with Rogan now feels like a guy realizing his boat is taking on water.

There’s a distinct tone in the way he’s talking about what the Trump administration is doing. He’s not celebrating it or hand-waving it away. He’s not doing the usual “well, both sides” routine. He’s describing it as horrifying, absurd, and wrong.

And the specific example he zeroed in on is telling.

Rogan reacts to the video of an ICE officer shooting Renee Good. He’s explicit about how horrific it looks, and he pushes back on the convenient justification that the federal government has been supplying us with. “She looks like she was turning the wheel,” he says. A stark contrast to conservatives who eagerly jumped on the initial narrative that Renee Good was aggressive.

The initial claim people made was that the shooting was “justifiable” because the officer had been intentionally hit by Renee’s car. But then a second angle emerged, and then a third. And with each angle it became increasingly more difficult to defend. We saw folks beginning to push back on the narrative that Renee Good did something wrong, or was violent in any way.

Masked agents are a problem

Then Rogan gets into what may be one of the most revealing parts of this conversation: the normalization of masked, unidentified federal agents operating in public.

He makes a point that is so obvious it’s amazing it even needs to be said.

If you’re arrested by a police officer, you can ask for their name and badge number. You can film them. There are at least some baseline norms of accountability, even if those norms are often violated.

But if you’re arrested by an ICE agent who is masked and refuses to identify themselves, what exactly is the public supposed to do?

Rogan’s point is that you have no such right. They are masked and they don’t have to tell you anything. In a functioning society, that should set off alarms.

Because once you normalize masked agents “snatching” people off the streets, you create a second problem that is almost guaranteed to follow: anyone can pretend to be them.

Criminals can impersonate ICE. Armed gangs can impersonate ICE. People can be robbed, abducted, or assaulted under the cover of “official-looking” intimidation. If the state itself is modeling anonymity and force, it hands a blueprint to everyone else.

“Where are your papers?”

Rogan describes a scenario that should disturb any American who believes we are supposed to have basic civil liberties: militarized people roaming around the streets, snatching others up, including U.S. citizens, because they don’t have the right paperwork on them at that moment.

And then he says the quiet part out loud.

“Are we really going to be the ‘where are your papers?’ country? Gestapo? Are we really doing this?”

It’s hard to argue with what Rogan is saying here. But if anything, he’s not going far enough in his criticism.

The significance is not that Joe Rogan has suddenly become some civil liberties scholar. The significance is that someone who played a role in mainstreaming Trump-era politics is now reacting in real time to what those politics look like when they move from slogans to street-level reality.

And when even Rogan is looking at it and saying: this is horrific, this looks like intimidation, this looks like masked forces roaming around, this looks like a country asking people for papers, it tells you something.

It tells you the propaganda is colliding with the footage.

Where does this go?

The bigger question isn’t whether Rogan is “good” or “bad” or whether his audience will suddenly become a coalition of civil libertarians.

The question is whether more people are reaching the same obvious conclusion: this is not normal, this is not okay, and it is not the kind of country anyone should want to live in.

If Joe Rogan is noticing it, plenty of other people are too.

What do you think is driving this shift? Is Rogan actually reconsidering, or is he just reacting to how ugly the visuals have become? And do you think his audience moves with him, or do they rationalize it away?

---

We’re reaching over 150 million people every month across YouTube, podcasts, Substack, and beyond. But algorithms can change. Platforms can fold. And when that happens, this newsletter is how we stay connected.

If you’re not yet a paid subscriber, please consider joining.
If you’re already paid on one platform, consider supporting us on both Substack and our website.

You can subscribe on our website and right here on Substack.

And if you’re really on fire, consider gifting a subscription—we’ve got thousands on our waiting list ready to read, watch, and fight back.

Let’s keep building.

—David

PS: Can’t contribute right now? No problem. You can support us for free by subscribing on YouTube, listening to our audio podcast on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, or become a free subscriber to this very Substack. Every bit counts.