Trump’s DOJ just targeted the woman who beat him in court
After being found civilly liable for sexual abuse and defamation, Trump is now overseeing a Justice Department investigation into the woman who defeated him in court.
Donald Trump’s Justice Department is now criminally investigating the woman he was found civilly liable for sexually abusing. That sentence alone should stop people in their tracks for a moment.
We are talking about E. Jean Carroll, the former magazine columnist who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in the 1990s. Carroll took Trump to court, defeated him multiple times, and ultimately won multimillion-dollar judgments after juries found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation.
Now, Trump’s Department of Justice has launched a criminal investigation into Carroll herself.
According to reporting from CNN, the investigation is focused on whether Carroll committed perjury during a 2022 deposition connected to her lawsuits against Trump. Specifically, investigators are looking at statements Carroll made about outside financial support for her legal expenses.
And this is where the story becomes much bigger than the narrow legal question being discussed on cable news panels.
The legal question versus the political reality
Legally speaking, perjury cases are notoriously difficult to prove.
You would have to establish not only that a statement was inaccurate, but that the person knowingly and intentionally lied in that moment. That is a very high bar. Even lawyers who deal with these kinds of cases regularly will tell you that proving criminal intent in a deposition is extremely difficult.
Could Carroll have knowingly lied? Maybe. Could she have misunderstood the question, forgotten details, or answered imprecisely? Also possible. That is precisely why perjury prosecutions are relatively rare and hard to win.
But the larger political optics here are impossible to ignore.
A president who was found civilly liable for sexually abusing a woman is now overseeing a Justice Department investigation into that same woman. The alleged offense centers around inconsistencies connected to litigation funding disclosures from years ago.
A lot of Americans are going to look at that and conclude this has less to do with neutral law enforcement and more to do with retaliation. And in a democracy, that should raise a lot of questions.
The “weaponized DOJ” reversal
For years, Trump and his allies claimed that President Joe Biden was “weaponizing” the Department of Justice against political opponents. That talking point became one of the central narratives of Trump-era politics. Every indictment, every investigation, every legal setback was framed as evidence that Biden was personally directing prosecutions behind the scenes.
The problem was there was never actual evidence Biden was sitting in the Oval Office orchestrating criminal investigations into Trump.
Now compare that to what is happening here.
Trump openly talks about revenge. He openly talks about retribution. He openly frames political opponents as enemies who deserve punishment. And now his administration is pursuing a criminal investigation into a woman who successfully sued him for sexual abuse and defamation. The irony is almost too perfect.
The thing Trump spent years accusing Biden of doing is now the thing Trump appears far more willing to actually do himself. And this pattern keeps repeating.
When Trump says institutions are politicized, what often follows is an effort to politicize them further. When Trump says prosecutions are unfair, what often follows is rhetoric about prosecuting critics. When Trump talks about ending political targeting, it increasingly sounds like he means redirecting the targeting toward his own enemies instead.
The Todd Blanche issue
There is another detail here that makes the situation look even worse.
Todd Blanche, who is now serving as acting attorney general and overseeing this matter, previously represented Donald Trump personally in the Carroll litigation.
Think about how extraordinary that is.
The lawyer who represented Trump in the case where Trump was found civilly liable for sexual abuse is now helping oversee a criminal investigation into the woman who defeated Trump in court. Even if every procedural rule is technically followed, the appearance of conflict is overwhelming. In democratic systems, appearances matter because public trust matters.
Justice systems only function when people believe the law is being applied consistently rather than selectively. Once large portions of the public begin viewing prosecutions as tools of personal vengeance, institutional credibility starts to erode very quickly.
The process can become the punishment
One of the realities people often miss is that even unsuccessful investigations can still inflict enormous damage.
Even if no charges are ever filed, being investigated by the federal government is financially draining, emotionally exhausting, and reputationally damaging. Lawyers cost money and public scrutiny becomes constant. The stress alone can dominate someone’s life for years.
Meanwhile, Trump is still appealing the civil judgments against him, including both the sexual abuse finding and the defamation awards. Carroll continues fighting those legal battles while simultaneously facing a new criminal investigation from the administration of the man she sued successfully.
That is going to look deeply troubling to many Americans, including people who may not even particularly like E. Jean Carroll. Because eventually the question becomes broader than Trump or Carroll individually.
What kind of system is this becoming?
The most important issue here is not whether you personally support Trump or personally believe Carroll.
The bigger question is whether Americans want a political system where presidents can direct enormous state power toward people who humiliated or challenged them personally. That is the real democratic stress test.
Does the justice system apply equally regardless of power, loyalty, or political usefulness? Or does it become something that can be turned selectively against critics and opponents?
Trump’s most hardcore supporters love this. They openly describe it as “finally getting justice.” They see revenge as strength. But outside that core base, many Americans are likely to see something darker: a president using federal power against a woman who defeated him in court and publicly damaged his image. Once a political culture starts normalizing that kind of retaliation, it rarely stays narrowly contained.
So what do you think? Is this legitimate law enforcement that just happens to involve one of Trump’s most famous adversaries, or does this cross the line into exactly the kind of political weaponization Trump spent years claiming to oppose?
We’re reaching over 150 million people every month across YouTube, podcasts, Substack, and beyond. But algorithms can change. Platforms can fold. And when that happens, this newsletter is how we stay connected.
If you’re not yet a paid subscriber, please consider joining.
If you’re already paid on one platform, consider supporting us on both Substack and our website.
You can subscribe on our website and right here on Substack.
And if you’re really on fire, consider gifting a subscription—we’ve got thousands on our waiting list ready to read, watch, and fight back.
Let’s keep building.
—David
PS: Can’t contribute right now? No problem. You can support us for free by subscribing on YouTube, listening to our audio podcast on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, or become a free subscriber to this very Substack. Every bit counts.
Everyone whom he's ever met is a target. This is absolutely appalling. This woman has had to suffer enough due to this man!
E. Jean Carroll can now sue the justice department for 10 billion dollars for defamation and character assassination!