ICE's secretive voter investigation should alarm Americans

With Election Day approaching, newly uncovered documents reveal a massive federal investigation into voter rolls and registration groups.

We are just days away from the midterm elections, and newly released government documents have revealed something extraordinary about what Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been doing with American voter information.

According to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, ICE’s investigative division has received more than 50 million voter records from the Department of Justice. These records are being collected as part of an effort to investigate supposed voter fraud, an issue that Donald Trump and his allies have spent years exaggerating despite the lack of evidence that noncitizen voting occurs at any statistically meaningful scale.

Before jumping to conclusions, we need to establish what these revelations do and do not tell us. Obtaining voter records does not mean ICE has changed anyone’s vote, deleted voter registrations, or interfered with ballots. We currently have no evidence that any of those things have happened.

But the documents raise some very serious questions about why an immigration enforcement agency is collecting information on tens of millions of American voters, what it intends to do with that information, and what safeguards exist to prevent misuse.

Given ICE’s recent track record, I don’t think Americans should simply be expected to take the agency’s word for it.

50 million voter records and a troubling list of states

The reporting comes from Jake Johnson at Common Dreams, based on documents obtained by the legal advocacy organization Democracy Forward through a Freedom of Information Act request.

According to those documents, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the investigative arm of ICE, obtained approximately 50.5 million voter roll records from the Justice Department. The agency also received roughly 26,000 additional records from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

The documents identify several priority states: Texas, Pennsylvania, California, New Jersey, Minnesota, Michigan, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, and Ohio.

Take a moment to consider that list. Several of those states are home to some of the most consequential elections taking place in just weeks. Control of Congress could come down to a handful of closely contested races, and the federal government’s immigration enforcement apparatus is collecting voter information from states that will help determine the country’s political future.

Now, there is nothing inherently improper about investigating legitimate voter fraud. Noncitizens are prohibited from voting in federal elections, and if there is credible evidence that someone has violated that law, the government has every right to investigate.

But collecting 50 million voter records does not establish that there are 50 million suspicious voters, 50 million noncitizens on the voter rolls, or anything remotely approaching 50 million fraudulent votes.

The government is gathering an enormous amount of information about American voters, and the public has yet to receive a convincing explanation of what evidence justifies an investigation of this scale.

Voter registration organizations are also being investigated

The documents reveal another concerning development. ICE has considered deploying undercover agents to investigate nonprofit organizations that help people register to vote.

These are organizations whose purpose is to help eligible Americans participate in the democratic process. Voter registration assistance is a perfectly legal and important part of maintaining an accessible electoral system.

Of course, if a particular organization is suspected of criminal wrongdoing and there is evidence supporting that suspicion, an investigation may be warranted. But the information revealed so far raises questions about what exactly ICE believes these organizations have done.

One particularly revealing detail involves New Jersey, where ICE reviewed more than 40 nonprofit organizations and reportedly found zero derogatory information.

Zero.

In other words, that review produced no evidence of wrongdoing. Yet the broader investigative effort appears to have continued.

We should be asking why federal immigration investigators are devoting resources to scrutinizing organizations that register eligible voters, particularly when their own reviews have failed to uncover misconduct.

There is also a potential chilling effect worth considering. Organizations that help Americans register to vote should not have to wonder whether their perfectly legal activities could attract undercover scrutiny from an agency primarily associated with immigration enforcement.

The Palantir connection raises even more questions

Perhaps the most alarming detail involves the potential use of immigration surveillance technology.

According to the documents, certain state voter records were being considered for entry into Palantir’s ELITE system, technology used by ICE to identify and locate individuals for immigration enforcement.

Think about what that could mean.

Voter registration databases contain information about Americans who are exercising one of their most fundamental democratic rights. ICE, meanwhile, uses surveillance and data analysis tools to locate people for immigration enforcement purposes.

The possibility of combining those two systems deserves extraordinary scrutiny.

There is an important qualification here. Democracy Docket, the publication associated with election attorney Marc Elias, reported that as of July, the voter information was awaiting entry into ELITE. A source familiar with the matter subsequently said that the information was never actually integrated into the system.

So we do not have confirmation that ICE uploaded those voter records into ELITE, and we should be careful not to suggest otherwise.

Nevertheless, the fact that this integration was apparently being considered raises an obvious question: Why would voter registration information be contemplated for inclusion in a system designed to locate people for immigration enforcement?

What legitimate investigative purpose would that serve, and what protections would prevent such information from being used inappropriately?

Those are questions the government should be prepared to answer.

---

---

A familiar name from the 2020 election

There is another figure connected to this story who deserves attention: Heather Honey.

Honey previously promoted false claims surrounding the 2020 presidential election and now holds a senior position within the Department of Homeland Security.

According to Democracy Forward, ICE obtained approximately 48 million additional records from sources associated with Honey’s work.

Those records are separate from the roughly 50.5 million voter records obtained from the Justice Department, although we do not know how much overlap exists between the two collections. It would therefore be misleading to simply add those numbers together and claim the government has assembled nearly 100 million unique voter records.

Still, the scale of the information being collected is remarkable.

The documents also reference investigations involving voting machines and counties associated with the 2020 election results.

Remember, we are now approaching the 2026 midterms. The 2020 election took place six years ago, and the false claims surrounding that election have been repeatedly investigated, litigated, and debunked.

Yet we are seeing federal immigration enforcement resources directed toward voter databases, registration organizations, and matters connected to the election conspiracy theories that have consumed the Republican Party for years.

When someone who helped promote those false narratives now occupies a senior position in the agency overseeing this work, it is reasonable to demand a much more detailed explanation of the government’s objectives.

What is ICE planning for Election Day?

There is one more development that I find particularly concerning.

According to Democracy Docket, ICE is withholding portions of the documents that relate to the agency’s potential role at polling places in November.

Again, we need to be precise about what this means. Withholding those records does not establish that ICE agents will be deployed to polling locations. We do not have evidence that such deployments are planned.

But it does leave a significant unanswered question about whether the agency is contemplating some form of involvement at polling places.

And given the political environment surrounding this election, that uncertainty deserves attention.

The Trump administration’s stated justification for these efforts is election integrity, specifically investigating the possibility of illegal voting by noncitizens.

Fine. If that is the justification, then the administration should be able to explain what credible evidence supports collecting tens of millions of voter records, examining voter registration organizations, and considering the use of immigration surveillance technology.

What specific problems have investigators identified? Why is this volume of information necessary? Who has access to the records? How long will they be retained? And what safeguards prevent information collected for one purpose from being used for another?

These are basic accountability questions, and answering them should not require years of litigation or a Freedom of Information Act request.

Americans deserve answers before November

The stakes of the upcoming midterms are enormous.

Americans are about to decide which party controls the House of Representatives and the Senate, and whether Donald Trump spends the final two years of his presidency facing meaningful congressional opposition or continues with a Republican majority capable of advancing his agenda.

Against that backdrop, we are learning that ICE has been collecting massive amounts of voter information, examining organizations that help Americans register to vote, and considering whether election data could be incorporated into immigration enforcement systems.

There are legitimate reasons for government agencies to investigate violations of election law. But those investigations must be grounded in evidence, conducted within appropriate legal boundaries, and subject to meaningful oversight.

The public should not have to discover through advocacy organizations and FOIA requests that federal agencies are assembling enormous collections of voter information without a clear explanation of why that information is needed or how it will be used.

We should also be able to distinguish between what has been documented and what remains uncertain. There is currently no evidence in these revelations that ICE has altered votes, deleted registrations, or interfered with ballots. That is important.

But the absence of evidence of those specific actions does not eliminate the need to scrutinize the government’s collection and potential use of voter data.

With Election Day approaching, transparency becomes even more urgent. Americans deserve to know what their government is doing with their information, especially when the agency involved has traditionally had little to do with administering elections.

Whether the Trump administration will provide those answers remains to be seen.

I'm curious to hear your thoughts on all of this, so let me know in the comments. And if you found this article valuable, please consider sharing it. The more people who are aware of what's happening, the better.

---

We’re reaching over 150 million people every month across YouTube, podcasts, Substack, and beyond. But algorithms can change. Platforms can fold. And when that happens, this newsletter is how we stay connected.

If you’re not yet a paid subscriber, please consider joining.
If you’re already paid on one platform, consider supporting us on both Substack and our website.

You can subscribe on our website and right here on Substack.

And if you’re really on fire, consider gifting a subscription—we’ve got thousands on our waiting list ready to read, watch, and fight back.

Let’s keep building.

—David

PS: Can’t contribute right now? No problem. You can support us for free by subscribing on YouTube, listening to our audio podcast on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, or become a free subscriber to this very Substack. Every bit counts.