70 Comments
User's avatar
Latwanda's avatar

Fuck you trump! I say what I want! How about that for word choice?

Judith's avatar
3hEdited

We don’t like the words He uses Most Days - Especially when he is Belittling and Threatening people while constantly Talking Word Salad - Can we turn off his mic and put him in a small place where He can talk amongst “Himself”? That way he would always get the answer he wants from “Himself”

Zara's avatar

When he discussed John Husted's *ass*, I was absolutely shocked that his audience laughed and applauded. Our president is now cat-calling men.

LadyHistorian's avatar

A bit of a sojourn out of his closet?

Mary Senior's avatar

I thought the same thing.

Linda's avatar

Ladies and gentlmen: the president of the United States...

Mary Senior's avatar

Judith: Great idea!

Wingfieldmcg@icloud.com's avatar

We’ve all become too intelligent to become little sycophants, haven’t we⁉️😡

Whatistobedone's avatar

"All"?!?! ~77,000,00 'murKKKans voted FOR the vulgarian little-girl rapist.

William F Johnston's avatar

"All"???? Surely you are not referring to the 47% who voted for that perverted moron?

Maria J Vorel's avatar

How about the words “Resist” & “Vote Blue”

Bill campion's avatar

How about Up your donny!!!!!

Andrea Mayhew's avatar

Tough. I will carry around the bill of rights. Done with the asswipe in DC

John Griffin's avatar

BUILD THE GALLOWS NOW 👍

Whatistobedone's avatar

NEVER. NEVER EVER. Until the moment of my last breath. NO ONE will dictate my words. Artificial intelligence. That's just the beginning. Gulf of Mexico. Canada. What was the other one ? I don't care. MaraLARDO?

Mary Senior's avatar

Good one. I love MaraLARDO! He renamed Lake Ontario, I think Lake America.

Kathleen Jackson's avatar

Everyone should post the words ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE on all social media platforms today!!

Robinsar's avatar

Artificial Intelligence?? AI.

Carol's avatar

Since “artificial” means fake or inferior, I think we should begin calling DJT The Artificial President, Donald J Trump. It has a nice ring to it.

Tracy Kohlbeck's avatar

He's just become accustomed to being able to rename anything he wants to anything he wants. Gulf of Mexico? Not anymore! Lake Ontario? Not anymore! And too many powers that be are going along with it.

Paige's avatar

Like with everything else, it's follow the money. I read shortly after his embarrassing Davos appearance, where he announced his idiotic name change for artificial intelligence, that the whole thing was about the fact that there were few desirable .ai domains remaining. In typical fashion, his family, friends, and cronies were able to snatch up all the .si domains for nothing because of the insider knowledge that he would be announcing the name change. All they needed to do was buy up just the .si domains that matched the .ai domains that the federal government owned, and they could make bank when he ordered the change throughout the government, even if no one else adopted it.

Zara's avatar

When some says or writes, "SI," who thinks of Sports Illustrated? I know that they can't copyright or trademark SI, but Sports Illustrated used it first.

Deirdre Mooney's avatar

Insightful stuff.

People from every walk of life in the US need to push back vigorously!

foofaraw & Chiquita(ARF!)'s avatar

He needs another "covfefe", which Trump little doubt actually believes is his legitimate contribution to the English language....

Tom Mosco's avatar

Every single time I hear a new attempt at language/thought control, I go find a teeshirt to buy, which mocks the demanded alteration. I now wear my “Gulf of Mexico” shirt, my “Lake Ontario” shirt, and I will definitely obtain an “artificial Intelligence” shirt, to publicly display a middle finger and my unwillingness to comply. I will NEVER comply with a king. We evicted King George and We, the People, can do it, again.

Lila Thompson's avatar

David, excellent article.

Two year old humans almost always learn un-needed demands and tantrums to get what they want will not be granted. Caretakers for example, redirect two year old to an acceptable activity or charge childs location.

In my opinion, we do not need a nation of two year old undesired behavior enablers for old tfump. It is bad for individuals and those with money or whatever tfump wants to control. Each person can activate change from the bottom up, just say no and do what is right.

Aocm🇨🇦🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️'s avatar

Excellent Lila, thanks: “each person can activate change”