What happens when facts become partisan?

A functioning democracy can survive disagreement. It struggles to survive when reality itself becomes politically negotiable.

There is a version of political disagreement that is perfectly normal in a democracy.

People can look at the same facts and arrive at different conclusions. One person might believe a policy is worth the tradeoff. Another might believe the costs are too high. That is politics.

But what happens when people are not even starting from the same factual baseline?

That is a very different problem.

And increasingly, it seems to be the actual problem in American politics.

---

---

When the facts themselves disappear

One of the more revealing realities of the Trump era is not simply that political divisions have deepened. It is that for many Americans, particularly within Trump’s political movement, the disagreement begins long before policy.

It begins at the level of basic factual understanding.

A recent NBC poll found that 85 percent of Republicans believe immigration causes crime. If that were true, then many of the policy positions they support would at least follow logically from that belief. If you genuinely believed more immigrants meant more crime, you would likely support harsher enforcement, broader deportation efforts, and more aggressive immigration restrictions.

The problem is that the underlying premise is false.

For years, data has consistently shown that immigrants, including undocumented immigrants, commit crimes at lower rates than native-born Americans. That does not settle every immigration debate. It is not an argument for ignoring border policy or pretending immigration systems do not require management.

But it does matter whether the public is operating from reality.

Because once a false premise becomes emotionally accepted as truth, the policy outcomes become predictable.

Fear becomes political fuel.

And politicians who promise to solve the invented crisis become far more appealing.

The tariff illusion

The same dynamic shows up in economic policy.

Polling has found that many Republicans believe tariff-related economic pain is either justified or not especially concerning because tariffs will supposedly create long-term economic benefits that outweigh the short-term costs.

But tariffs are, functionally, import taxes.

They raise prices. That is not controversial economic theory. That is simply how the mechanism works. And yet if voters have been convinced tariffs are some kind of painless patriotic economic weapon, then support for those policies becomes easier to understand.

Not because the policy necessarily makes sense, but because the factual understanding underneath it is broken. This is where politics becomes especially difficult.

If voters believe a problem exists when it does not, they will support unnecessary or harmful solutions. If voters deny a real problem exists, they will resist solutions that might actually help. In both cases, governance becomes almost impossible.

Propaganda works

There is an uncomfortable reality embedded in all of this. The misinformation is not random.

It is working.

Beliefs about immigration and crime among Republicans did not emerge in a vacuum. They were cultivated through years of repetition, messaging, media reinforcement, and political rhetoric designed to create emotional certainty rather than factual understanding.

That is what propaganda does. Not necessarily through complexity. Often through repetition.

Say something enough times, frame it emotionally enough times, attach it to identity enough times, and eventually many people stop evaluating whether it is true at all. It simply becomes part of how they understand the world.

And once political identity becomes fused with factual misconceptions, changing minds becomes much harder because correcting the fact can feel, psychologically, like attacking the person.

The accountability paradox

There is a temptation to stop the analysis there. To simply conclude that Trump supporters do not know basic facts, laugh at the contradiction, and move on.

But that does not actually solve anything.

Mockery might feel satisfying for five minutes. It does not rebuild civic reality. The harder question is what actually causes people to reconsider. Interestingly, some of that may already be happening.

Not necessarily because people are being persuaded by opposing arguments, but because reality has a way of eventually colliding with political promises. If someone was told tariffs would quickly improve their economic life and that never materializes, some will begin asking questions.

If sweeping promises about foreign threats, economic miracles, or national restoration never produce results, some people do begin reassessing.

Not everyone. But some. And that’s important.

Because if someone genuinely believed the false premise, their political choices become much easier to understand. That does not excuse those choices. But understanding the mechanism matters if the goal is actually changing outcomes.

America’s trust problem

This may ultimately be the deeper American crisis.

Not polarization. Not disagreement. Not even ideology.

Trust.

Trust in institutions. Trust in expertise. Trust in data. Trust that some facts remain true whether they are politically convenient or not. Because democracy cannot really function if every policy argument starts with entirely separate realities.

At that point, politics stops becoming persuasion.

It becomes tribal storytelling.

And once that happens, accountability becomes incredibly difficult because evidence itself no longer carries shared meaning.

So I’m curious what you think: can people be brought back once politics becomes part identity, part alternate reality, or are we already much deeper into that spiral than most of us want to admit?

---

We’re reaching over 150 million people every month across YouTube, podcasts, Substack, and beyond. But algorithms can change. Platforms can fold. And when that happens, this newsletter is how we stay connected.

If you’re not yet a paid subscriber, please consider joining.
If you’re already paid on one platform, consider supporting us on both Substack and our website.

You can subscribe on our website and right here on Substack.

And if you’re really on fire, consider gifting a subscription—we’ve got thousands on our waiting list ready to read, watch, and fight back.

Let’s keep building.

—David

PS: Can’t contribute right now? No problem. You can support us for free by subscribing on YouTube, listening to our audio podcast on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, or become a free subscriber to this very Substack. Every bit counts.