What Trump says vs what Trump does

The gap between rhetoric and reality explains this administration better than any speech.

Before we get into it: if you’re receiving this via email, thank you. You’re already subscribed. If you’re not, now is the time.

There’s a basic mistake people keep making when they analyze the Trump administration. They listen to what Trump and his allies say and assume those words reflect what they actually believe.

They don’t.

If the administration genuinely believed its own rhetoric, it would behave very differently. The real story is not in the speeches or slogans. It’s in the widening gap between words and actions. That gap tells you far more than any press release ever could.

Where the real story lives

Politics has always involved exaggeration, but this goes well beyond normal spin. What we’re watching is a pattern in which rhetoric functions as marketing rather than as a set of guiding commitments. Once you stop treating the language as sincere and start treating it as instrumental, the behavior suddenly makes sense. The contradictions stop looking accidental and start looking deliberate.

That is where the analysis needs to begin.

Cancel culture was never about principle

For years, MAGA figures warned that cancel culture posed an existential threat to free speech. Trump’s 2025 inaugural address promised that the power of the state would never again be weaponized against political opponents. That promise barely survived the inauguration.

Within months, the administration launched a sweeping cultural crackdown. Federal oversight of university curricula was expanded. Institutions deemed politically misaligned were threatened with consequences. None of this was subtle, and none of it was accidental.

This wasn’t a betrayal of principle, but a revelation.

The rhetoric about free speech was never about protecting expression in the abstract. It was about who gets to exercise power. “Cancel culture is bad” was always shorthand for “cancel culture is bad when it’s used against us.” When it’s used against others, it suddenly becomes governance.

Why principles don’t restrain the right

This is why I devoted an entire chapter of my book, The Echo Machine, to the importance of understanding values and principles. Why do we believe what we believe? What are those beliefs supposed to restrain when holding them becomes politically inconvenient?

With the modern right, those questions rarely matter. Their principles are conditional. They exist only as long as they are useful. When a principle conflicts with power, it is quietly abandoned, replaced by a justification that sounds moral but functions strategically.

The rhetoric remains lofty. The behavior is purely transactional.

Immigration as performance

The same pattern plays out with immigration and border security.

The 2025 executive orders were sold as a national emergency. We were told this was about sovereignty, election integrity, and an urgent threat to the nation. ICE deployments were framed as unavoidable responses to crisis. If the administration actually believed this was a real emergency, the response would look very different.

Real emergencies demand difficult work. They require legislation, coalition building, and detailed policy that addresses structural failures. That work is slow, messy, and politically risky. It does not lend itself to viral clips or dramatic headlines.

Yet the administration controls the White House, the Senate, and the House. Comprehensive immigration reform proposals already exist. Democrats have put them forward. Republicans like John McCain did years ago. Deporting people en masse without fixing the system does nothing to resolve the underlying problem.

And yet that is the path they chose.

Why?

Because the goal is spectacle, not policy.

Raids generate headlines. Executive orders create news cycles, even when they are legally questionable and quickly challenged or blocked. The brutality and immorality of ICE operations produce images that rally a segment of the base. Structurally, however, the approach accomplishes almost nothing.

There is no durable solution. There is no long-term fix. There is only performance.

The pattern IS the point

Once you see this pattern, it becomes impossible to unsee it. Free speech for us, suppression for them. Emergency rhetoric without emergency solutions. Moral language paired with political convenience. Power first, principle later, if ever.

This administration is not driven by ideology in the way it claims to be. It is driven by optics, control, and short-term political payoff.

Everything else is theater.

And until we judge this administration by what it does rather than what it says, we will keep missing the story that is right in front of us.

---

We’re reaching over 150 million people every month across YouTube, podcasts, Substack, and beyond. But algorithms can change. Platforms can fold. And when that happens, this newsletter is how we stay connected.

If you’re not yet a paid subscriber, please consider joining.
If you’re already paid on one platform, consider supporting us on both Substack and our website.

You can subscribe on our website and right here on Substack.

And if you’re really on fire, consider gifting a subscription—we’ve got thousands on our waiting list ready to read, watch, and fight back.

Let’s keep building.

—David

PS: Can’t contribute right now? No problem. You can support us for free by subscribing on YouTube, listening to our audio podcast on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, or become a free subscriber to this very Substack. Every bit counts.